<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:swrc="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">

<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://weko.wou.edu.my/?action=repository_uri&amp;item_id=554">
	<rdf:type>http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Misc</rdf:type>
	<swrc:title xml:lang="en">The content of teachers&#039; reflection in lessson study: a case study</swrc:title>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<swrc:keyword xml:lang="en">Lesson study</swrc:keyword>
	<swrc:keyword xml:lang="en">Reflection</swrc:keyword>
	<swrc:keyword xml:lang="en">Primary school teacher</swrc:keyword>
	<swrc:keyword xml:lang="en">Mathematics</swrc:keyword>
	<swrc:editor xml:lang="en">Saw Fen Tan</swrc:editor>
	<swrc:editor xml:lang="en">Chap Sam Lim</swrc:editor>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Teacher education</dc:subject>
	<swrc:abstract xml:lang="en">This study aimed to explore the content and the level of teachers&#039; reflection as they engage in lesson study (LS). Two LS groups participated in this study. However, this paper only discussed the content of the teachers&#039; reflection from one LS group. This group comprised of six primary mathematics teachers. They carried out five LS cycles. Each cycle comprised of four steps, namely; (1) identify and formulate goals; (2) plan lesson plan collaboratively; (3) teach/observe the research lesson; and (4) reflect/refine lesson plan. The researchers participated in all the cycles to guide and to observe the participants.</swrc:abstract>
	<swrc:type xml:lang="en"> Electronic </swrc:type>
	<swrc:abstract xml:lang="en">Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Teacher Learning and Development Conference (2016 ; Penang, Malaysia)</swrc:abstract>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en">Wawasan Open University</dc:contributor>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>